(Online First) “Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes.” Argumentation.
2021 “Youth voting, rational competency, and epistemic injustice.” Informal Logic, 41 (1), pp. 41-55.
2019 (with H. Martin, Z. Vahedi, and S. Ahadi). “Is There a Case for Gamification in Business Ethics Education? An Empirical Study”. Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum, 19 (2), pp. 113-127
2019 (with Harmony Peach) “They Can’t be Believed: Children, Intersectionality, and Epistemic Injustice.” Journal of Global Ethics, 15 (3), pp. 213-232.
2018 - “Navigating a Necessary Inequality: Children and Knowledge-Based Injustice,” in Social Inequality and the Spectre of Social Justice. C. Fanelli, G. Potter, J. Noonan & J. Essex (Eds.), Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research Vol 29, pp. 294-306.
2018 – “Introduction to the Special Issue: Reason and Rhetoric in the Time of Alternative Facts." Informal Logic, 38 (1), pp. 1-12.
2018 - “Reasoning and Arguing, Dialectically and Dialogically, among Individual and Multiple Participants.” Argumentation, 32 (1), pp. 77-98.
2018 (with João Sàágua) “Practical Rationality at Work - A New Argumentation Model.” In J. Sàágua, & A. Marques (Eds.), Essays on Value and Practical Rationality - Ethical and Aesthetical Dimensions (pp. 193-230). Bern: Peter Lang.
2017 – “Others and Imagination in Reasoning and Argumentation: Improving our Critical Creative Capacity.” Informal Logic, 37 (2), pp. 129-151.
2016 – “The Willingness to be Rationally Persuaded,” in P. Bondy and L. Benacquista (Eds). Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016. Windsor, Ontario.
2015 - Improving Practical Reasoning and Argumentation. (Dissertation). Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
2014 - “Delineating the reasonable and rational for humans,” in B Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell & F.S. Henkemans (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2014 International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) Conference, Amsterdam. Pp. 94-101.